TEST THE RISK!

Test it or let the customers do it in wild! Testing is not a state it is a process, any failures in the process, make the quality ruined. Moreover, any failures detected in any part of a product make the product fail in terms of customers. Therefore we need to deploy the quality as a process of products and services which are given to customers along the product life cycle. In this post, I want to explain the importance of testing with the case of the successful Korean technology company 'Samsung'. The real problem with the product is that design of the battery has some defective points because they want to push boundaries too much for having more power small battery cell. For more detail, you can this post . Let's look at product life cycle management (PLM) first. It explains a product from an idea to delivering a product and terminating support. It divides the product life cycle management into four main stages as follows: Conceive  : Imagine, specify, plan, innovate Des

Test case design is the most important part of test automation since it is the starting point of the automation code. Writing effective and efficient test case can make your code more stable and more successful. For BDD approach, the feature files hold the test cases or scenarios and these scenarios are derived by depending on the acceptance criterias written in the stories. Therefore the feature files should cover all the acceptance criteria plus some more test cases produced from exploratory testing.  The approach for the writing your scenarios can be imperative or declarative or mix of both. In this post want to explain my understanding from the design approaches and their prons and cons.  For dictionary meaning of imperative is giving authoritative command,  and declarative is taking the form of a simple statement according to the Oxford dictionary . My understanding from this explanation is that you can say "do this ..." as an imperative way or you can say