TEST THE RISK!

Introduction When it comes to automation testing, Selenium is a household name. With its extensive range of capabilities and flexibility, it has become an indispensable tool for quality assurance engineers. One of the most significant features of Selenium is its ability to run in headless mode, allowing testers to execute tests without the need for a visible browser instance. In this article, we'll delve into the world of headless mode, specifically exploring the `headless=new` parameter and its implications for Selenium testing. What is Headless Mode? Headless mode is a configuration option in Selenium that enables running browser instances without displaying a visible UI. This mode is particularly useful for automating tasks on cloud infrastructure, where a graphical interface is not available, or for running tests on a continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline. By default, when you use headless mode, Selenium will launch a browser instance in the background, ...

Integration testing has an important role in the test pyramid, it aims to test the integrations of the software products in the integration environments. This means that the software should be built and deployed to an integration test environment and then run the test against the version in the testing environment. If anything wrong occurs as a regression issue then the CI gives feedback about the failures. As a result, the issue should be fixed and built and deployed to the integration test environment. Therefore this process is very expensive and is so late for the modern approach to SDLC, for the shift-left approach. As a solution to this problem, we should consider testing the integration isolatedly within the context of the software itself. Contract testing is an approach to testing the integration depending on the written contract during the build phase. In this post, I want to explain the importance of contract testing. What is Contract The contract is a document created by the ...

Testing will be more efficient when testers and developers work in collaboration. Especially when it comes to automated testing, we have many challenging points that should be solved with the help of the other team members. This is a basic explanation of the cross-functional team. For mobile application automated end-to-end testing, this cross-functional team approach can be easily applied by contributing the same code base so native toolings give us this. This can increase the quality of the tests code and the framework by the feedback from the developers, and increase the quality of the tests by the feedback from the testers. In this post, I want to give some idea about the benefits of using native mobile automation toolings such as Espresso and XCUITest. What is Native Tooling Native mobile automation toolings are integrated libraries to the mobile application development framework so that developers can write UI tests for the products under development. Native toolings are part o...

In this post, I want to give you some practical information about a monitoring system for automated tests. I will touch the following topics: Why we need a monitoring system for automated tests What are the potential benefits of the monitoring system A simple approach using the following technologies: Elasticsearch Kibana Firebase test lab, gcloud and gsutil XCTest and Espresso What is the Centralization of Log Systems In a development pipeline, we have a variety of tools and technologies with different languages and scripts. CI/CD pipeline is a good place the see the process of the development, but to get the detail of an item in the pipeline, we need to get into that item and tackle with logs and data. Some times this investigation requires some capabilities to understand it. One of the easiest ways to get a common understanding from the logs in the pipeline is using one easy tool for the whole process. When we collect all the...