Skip to main content

AI in Software Testing

Artificial intelligence (AI) has permeated every aspect of our lives, and software testing is no exception. In fact, AI is revolutionizing traditional testing practices, making them more efficient, effective, and adaptable to the demands of modern software development. By leveraging AI, teams can deliver high-quality software products that meet the evolving needs of both users and businesses. There has been ongoing debate about whether AI will eventually render manual and automated testing obsolete. In my opinion, this prospect is unlikely in the near future, particularly with regards to manual testing. However, AI is making significant strides in automated testing, albeit not yet at a satisfactory level. Currently, the greatest value of AI lies in supporting various activities, freeing up time for testing teams to focus on high-value tasks that require expertise in test engineering and product domain knowledge.

LLM Based Application
If you're a consultant like myself, you may wonder how to harness the power of AI in software testing. To stay ahead of the curve, it's essential to gain expertise in the following areas:

Testing AI-based applications/products

  1. Testing traditional applications is mostly comparing the app with the requirements. However, an AI-based application can create different results with positive test results.
  2. Limiting testing activity is not deterministic for AI testing, understanding the AI algorithm and then doing more testing on the result could open new rooms for testing and it can lead to endless testing effort.
  3. LLM-based application has LLM Models at the heart of the architecture but testing the other parts of the component is similar to testing any products. Here we should add testing the integration of the component. Contract testing can play a crucial role in testing the microservices as well as checking some prompts on the integration of the LLM.

Creating AI-based testing tools to support testing

Based on the experience, we can also create open-source tools to support testing. When we talk about AI in testing, we mostly talk about automation but it is not limited with automation. In fact, many companies created paid tools for test automation. We should leverage the benefits of using AI in other areas as well.

Using AI in software testing like

  • Automated Test Case Generation: AI algorithms can generate test cases automatically, reducing the manual effort required to create test scripts.
  • Intelligent Test Prioritization: AI can analyze code changes and prioritize test cases based on risk, impact, and likelihood of failure, optimizing testing resources.
  • Defect Prediction: AI models can analyze historical data to predict potential defects, enabling proactive measures to prevent issues before deployment.
  • Anomaly Detection: AI algorithms can identify abnormal behavior in software systems, helping to detect bugs and performance issues early.
  • Visual Testing Automation: AI-powered tools can automate visual testing by identifying UI changes, layout issues, and graphical glitches across different devices and browsers.
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) Testing: AI can understand and analyze natural language requirements and test cases, improving the efficiency of testing processes.
  • Test Data Generation: AI techniques like generative adversarial networks (GANs) can create realistic test data sets, enhancing test coverage and accuracy.
  • Dynamic Test Environment Management: AI can dynamically allocate and configure test environments based on project requirements, reducing setup time and resources.
  • Regression Testing Optimization: AI can intelligently select and prioritize regression test suites, focusing on areas most likely affected by code changes.
  • Performance Testing Optimization: AI algorithms can simulate real-world user behavior to perform load, stress, and performance testing, identifying bottlenecks and optimizing system performance.
  • Self-Healing Test Automation: AI-powered testing frameworks can automatically update test scripts to adapt to changes in the application under test, reducing maintenance efforts.
  • Code Coverage Analysis: AI can analyze code coverage metrics and suggest improvements to ensure comprehensive testing coverage.
  • Cross-Browser and Cross-Device Testing: AI-driven tools can automate testing across various browsers, devices, and screen resolutions, ensuring consistent user experiences.
  • Behavior-Driven Testing (BDT): AI can assist in translating business requirements into executable test scenarios, aligning testing efforts with business objectives.
  • Security Testing: AI can identify security vulnerabilities by analyzing code patterns and behaviors, helping to fortify applications against cyber threats.
Stay tuned, I will be writing more on how we can efficiently use AI in testing. Happy testing!

Popular posts for software testing and automation

Selenium Error "Element is not currently interactable and may not be manipulated"

Selenium webdriver can drive different browsers like as Firefox, Chrome or Internet Explorer. These browsers actually cover the majority of internet users, so testing these browsers possibly covers the 90% of the internet users. However, there is no guaranty that the same automation scripts can work without a failure on these three browsers. For this reason, automation code should be error-prone for the browsers you want to cover. The following error is caught when the test script run for Chrome and Internet Explorer, but surprisingly there is no error for the Firefox. Selenium gives an error like below: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "D:\workspace\sample_project\", line 10, in <module>     m.login()   File "D:\workspace\ sample_project \", line 335, in login     driver.find_element_by_id("id_username").clear()   File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\selenium-2.35.0-py2.7.egg\selenium\webdriver\r

Change Default Timeout and Wait Time of Capybara

One of the biggest challenge for automation is handling timeout problem. Most of the time, timeout is 60 seconds but it may sometimes not enough if you have badly designed asynchronous calls or the third party ajax calls. This makes handling timeout more complex. set large enough to tolerate network related problems. For Selenium based automation frameworks, like Capybara, default Webdriver timeout is set to Net::ReadTimeout (Net::ReadTimeout) Changing ReadTimeout If you have timeout problem for Capybara, it gives an error like above. This means that the page is not fully loaded in given timeout period. Even you can see that page is loaded correctly but webdriver wait until the Ajax calls finish. class BufferedIO #:nodoc: internal use only def initialize (io) @io = io @read_timeout = 60 @continue_timeout = nil @debug_output = nil @rbuf = '' end . . . . . def rbuf_fill beg

Create an Alias for Interactive Console Work: Selenium and Capybara

If you are working on shell most of the time Aliases are very helpfull and time saving. For testing purposes you can use Alias for getting ready your test suites. In this post, I want to explain both running Selenium and Capybara on console and creating aliases for each.  This post is for Windows machines, if you are using Unix-like see   this post . Creating Scripts for Selenium and Capybara First of all, it is assumed that you have installed Selenium and Capybara correctly and they work on your machines. If you haven't installed, you can see my previous posts. I am using the Selenium with Python and the Capybara with Ruby. You can use several different language for Selenium but Capybara works only with Ruby.  Create scripts in a directory called scripts (in your home folder, like as  ~/scripts ) for your automation tool as following, save them as capybara.rb, :  Creating Aliases Depends on your favourite shell, you need to add the alias to .bashrc bash

Page-Object Pattern for Selenium Test Automation with Python

Page-object model is a pattern that you can apply it to develop efficient automation framework. With the page-model, it is possible to minimize maintenance cost. Basically page-object means that your every page is inherited from a base class which includes basic functionalities for every page. If you have some new functionalities that every page should have, you can simple add it to the base class. Base class is like the following: In this part we are creating pages which are inherited from base page. Every page has its own functionalities written as python functions. Some functions return to a new page, it means that these functions leave the current page and produce a new page. You should write as much as functions you need in the assertion part because this is the only part you can use the webdriver functions to interact with web pages . This part can be evaluate as providing data to assertion part.   The last part is related to asserting your test cases against to the

Performance Testing on CI: Locust is running on Jenkins

For a successful Continuous Integration pipeline, there should be jobs for testing the performance of the application. It is necessary if the application is still performing well. Generally performance testing is thought as kinds of activities performed one step before going to live. In general approach it is true but don't forget to test your application's performance as soon as there is an testable software, such as an api end point, functions, and etc. For CI it is a good approach to testing performance after functional testing and just before the deployment of next stage. In this post, I want to share some info about Jenkins and Locust. In my previous post you can find some information about Locust and Jenkins. Jenkins operates the CI environment and Locust is a tool for performance testing. To run the Locust on Jenkins you need command line arguments which control the number of clients ,   hatch rate,  running locust without web interface and there should be so