Skip to main content

What the Fact with Integration Testing

Integration testing, a crucial phase in the software development life cycle, plays a pivotal role in ensuring that individual components of a system work seamlessly when combined. Other than the unit tests in the unit level, every thing in the software development process is a kind of integration the pieces. This can be  integration-in-small like integration of the components or it cane integration-in-big such as integration of services/APIs.  While integration testing is essential, it is not without its challenges. In this blog post, we'll explore the issues of speed, reliability, and maintenance that often plague integration testing processes.

1. Speed

Integration testing involves testing the interactions between different components of a system. As the complexity of the software grows, so does the number of interactions that need to be tested. This increase in interactions can significantly slow down the testing process. With modern applications becoming more intricate, the time taken for integration tests can become a bottleneck, hindering the overall development speed.

Automating integration tests are slow and more expensive because:
  • Dependent parts must be deployed to test environments
  • All part must have latest version
  • CI must run all previous tasks like
    • Static checks
    • Unit tests
    • Reviews
    • Deployments
  • OK let's run the API Testing project 
Solutions: Employ parallel testing; running tests concurrently can significantly reduce the time taken for integration testing. 
Argument: This is OK to be able to reduce the time spent for the integration testing but that is the final step in the process we still need to perform all the necessary steps.

Solution: Prioritize tests; Identify critical integration points and focus testing efforts on these areas to ensure faster feedback on essential functionalities.
Argument: Prioritization should be for any case but we must be careful not miss the necessary test cases. Reporting the issues found for the parts that are other than the essential parts will cause another problem about the overall quality. Also we still have to wait until all the process to be done to run the integration testing again.

2. Reliability

The reliability of integration tests is a common concern. Flaky tests, which produce inconsistent results, can erode the confidence in the testing process. Flakiness can stem from various sources such as external dependencies, race conditions, or improper test design. Unreliable tests can lead to false positives and negatives, making it challenging to identify genuine issues.

Solution: Isolate tests; Minimize external dependencies and isolate integration tests to ensure they are self-contained and less susceptible to external factors.
Argument: Dependencies are the required parts that should be also ready and integrated to the environments. We can reduce the dependencies by mocking but we still need to check the integration of that mocked part of the system. 

Solution: Regular maintenance; Continuously update and refactor tests to ensure they remain reliable as the codebase evolves.
Argument: The regular check should be done when ever there is a requirement update and failure of the tests. However we know that the integration testing is isolated from the business after the tests were created and for the most of the case, the integration testing project is driven by the QA team now. For the best case update will be done when the failures occur on the CI pipeline.

3. Maintenance

Maintaining integration tests can be cumbersome, especially in agile environments where the codebase undergoes frequent changes. As the software evolves, integration points may shift, leading to outdated or irrelevant tests. Outdated tests can provide false assurance, leading to potential issues slipping through the cracks.

Solution: Automation; automate the integration testing process as much as possible to quickly detect issues when new code is introduced.
Argument: Automation is in the essence. We have to automate not only the tests but also the process. But the for the most case, integration testing process is not an integral part of the development process so this cause the decomposition.  

Solution: Version control; Store test cases alongside the codebase in version control systems, ensuring that tests are updated alongside the code changes.
Argument: Version control inside the integration project helps protecting main branch to be safe but the version of the code that aimed to be tested is not reconciled with the version of the code that is testing. This is not providing extra benefits for the overall quality.

In conclusion, while integration testing is crucial for identifying issues that arise when different components interact, it is essential to be aware of and address the challenges related to speed, reliability, and maintenance. By employing the right strategies and tools, development teams can mitigate these challenges and ensure that integration testing remains effective, efficient, and reliable throughout the software development process. Because of these reasons, it is time to think about "contract testing". 

Popular posts for software testing and automation

Selenium Error "Element is not currently interactable and may not be manipulated"

Selenium webdriver can drive different browsers like as Firefox, Chrome or Internet Explorer. These browsers actually cover the majority of internet users, so testing these browsers possibly covers the 90% of the internet users. However, there is no guaranty that the same automation scripts can work without a failure on these three browsers. For this reason, automation code should be error-prone for the browsers you want to cover. The following error is caught when the test script run for Chrome and Internet Explorer, but surprisingly there is no error for the Firefox. Selenium gives an error like below: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "D:\workspace\sample_project\", line 10, in <module>     m.login()   File "D:\workspace\ sample_project \", line 335, in login     driver.find_element_by_id("id_username").clear()   File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\selenium-2.35.0-py2.7.egg\selenium\webdriver\r

Change Default Timeout and Wait Time of Capybara

One of the biggest challenge for automation is handling timeout problem. Most of the time, timeout is 60 seconds but it may sometimes not enough if you have badly designed asynchronous calls or the third party ajax calls. This makes handling timeout more complex. set large enough to tolerate network related problems. For Selenium based automation frameworks, like Capybara, default Webdriver timeout is set to Net::ReadTimeout (Net::ReadTimeout) Changing ReadTimeout If you have timeout problem for Capybara, it gives an error like above. This means that the page is not fully loaded in given timeout period. Even you can see that page is loaded correctly but webdriver wait until the Ajax calls finish. class BufferedIO #:nodoc: internal use only def initialize (io) @io = io @read_timeout = 60 @continue_timeout = nil @debug_output = nil @rbuf = '' end . . . . . def rbuf_fill beg

Create an Alias for Interactive Console Work: Selenium and Capybara

If you are working on shell most of the time Aliases are very helpfull and time saving. For testing purposes you can use Alias for getting ready your test suites. In this post, I want to explain both running Selenium and Capybara on console and creating aliases for each.  This post is for Windows machines, if you are using Unix-like see   this post . Creating Scripts for Selenium and Capybara First of all, it is assumed that you have installed Selenium and Capybara correctly and they work on your machines. If you haven't installed, you can see my previous posts. I am using the Selenium with Python and the Capybara with Ruby. You can use several different language for Selenium but Capybara works only with Ruby.  Create scripts in a directory called scripts (in your home folder, like as  ~/scripts ) for your automation tool as following, save them as capybara.rb, :  Creating Aliases Depends on your favourite shell, you need to add the alias to .bashrc bash

Page-Object Pattern for Selenium Test Automation with Python

Page-object model is a pattern that you can apply it to develop efficient automation framework. With the page-model, it is possible to minimize maintenance cost. Basically page-object means that your every page is inherited from a base class which includes basic functionalities for every page. If you have some new functionalities that every page should have, you can simple add it to the base class. Base class is like the following: In this part we are creating pages which are inherited from base page. Every page has its own functionalities written as python functions. Some functions return to a new page, it means that these functions leave the current page and produce a new page. You should write as much as functions you need in the assertion part because this is the only part you can use the webdriver functions to interact with web pages . This part can be evaluate as providing data to assertion part.   The last part is related to asserting your test cases against to the

Performance Testing on CI: Locust is running on Jenkins

For a successful Continuous Integration pipeline, there should be jobs for testing the performance of the application. It is necessary if the application is still performing well. Generally performance testing is thought as kinds of activities performed one step before going to live. In general approach it is true but don't forget to test your application's performance as soon as there is an testable software, such as an api end point, functions, and etc. For CI it is a good approach to testing performance after functional testing and just before the deployment of next stage. In this post, I want to share some info about Jenkins and Locust. In my previous post you can find some information about Locust and Jenkins. Jenkins operates the CI environment and Locust is a tool for performance testing. To run the Locust on Jenkins you need command line arguments which control the number of clients ,   hatch rate,  running locust without web interface and there should be so