Skip to main content

Deterministic Way of Test Automation


Test automation scripts should be simple. This doesn't mean that software product code should be complex. Actually,when everything is simple then the life will be simpler. However sometimes we need to explain something in a complex way. Most of the time, simple is difficult. There may be different reasons behind the complexity but it is clear that if we knew it clearly, we would explain it simply. Let's look at what Albert Einstein says: 

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."

As the subject is how simplicity can be applied to test automation, I will focus on simple but efficient test scripts. To enable to write simple test scripts, we must clarify undefined, non-clear, dependent factors on every case/stories. This kind of approach is called as determinism in philosophy. According to the Princeton University dictionary, determinism means as: 

"determinism ((philosophy) a philosophical theory holding that all events are inevitable consequences of antecedent sufficient causes; often understood as denying the possibility of free will)"

This approach is used in software industry as every deterministic conditions are  called as state machine. As a test technique, we state transition table to create test cases. In this method every states is discrete and deterministic so that passing from one state to another state, we know pre-conditions and the result. Therefore any unexpected results can be classified as a bug.    


To define a state as deterministic, we must test if it has any un-deterministic characters. The following items should be passed: 
  1. Check if any time delay what happens
  2. Check if every case is discrete
  3. Check if every inputs to the state are determined
  4. Check if the failure of the another state effect the output
  5. Check if the assumptions are determined
  6. Check if you cover an unexpected condition happens 


If you have an un-deterministic state, you must think the out-of-the box. As a solution, Martin Fowler suggests the following solutions:
  • Quarantine: any un-deterministic test should be isolated from others and put in another test suite. By this way, other deterministic test cases will be in secure. But do not forget, there is a case waiting to be solved in quarantine.
  • Isolation: Every test case should be discrete. So as starting a case it should prepare its precondition and after the case finishes, it should draw back the test suite. A test case should not use a variable or instance which is produced by another test case.
  • Asynchronous Behaviours: If there is a time delay between actions, an easy way to add a constant sleep time. However, time may not enough for situations. There are two options, first one is to wait a replay until the response is come an then perform second actions. The second method is to ask regularly if the expected result is performed.
  • Remote Services: Prepare remote services for testing purpose but be sure that it should be deterministic.
  • Time: If you have time related test cases, before starting the test case you should wrap the time.
for detail information you can read this blog.  


Example for Deterministic Test Case

Let's create user for an e-commerce site. To create a user we need a e-mail account which is not used before. In the example, before using the e-mail address is checking from database and deleted it is exit. 

For the second test case, we are checking if the e-mail field is giving a warning when we use already registered email. To create a discrete test case, a user registered with given e-mail but this we don't delete from database so create different state and then trying to use same e-mail and then checking if the warning is given.

   

Popular posts for software testing and automation

Selenium Error "Element is not currently interactable and may not be manipulated"

Selenium webdriver can drive different browsers like as Firefox, Chrome or Internet Explorer. These browsers actually cover the majority of internet users, so testing these browsers possibly covers the 90% of the internet users. However, there is no guaranty that the same automation scripts can work without a failure on these three browsers. For this reason, automation code should be error-prone for the browsers you want to cover. The following error is caught when the test script run for Chrome and Internet Explorer, but surprisingly there is no error for the Firefox. Selenium gives an error like below: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "D:\workspace\sample_project\sample_run.py", line 10, in <module>     m.login()   File "D:\workspace\ sample_project \test_case_imps.py", line 335, in login     driver.find_element_by_id("id_username").clear()   File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\selenium-2.35.0-py2.7.egg\selenium\webdriver\r

Change Default Timeout and Wait Time of Capybara

One of the biggest challenge for automation is handling timeout problem. Most of the time, timeout is 60 seconds but it may sometimes not enough if you have badly designed asynchronous calls or the third party ajax calls. This makes handling timeout more complex. set large enough to tolerate network related problems. For Selenium based automation frameworks, like Capybara, default Webdriver timeout is set to Net::ReadTimeout (Net::ReadTimeout) Changing ReadTimeout If you have timeout problem for Capybara, it gives an error like above. This means that the page is not fully loaded in given timeout period. Even you can see that page is loaded correctly but webdriver wait until the Ajax calls finish. class BufferedIO #:nodoc: internal use only def initialize (io) @io = io @read_timeout = 60 @continue_timeout = nil @debug_output = nil @rbuf = '' end . . . . . def rbuf_fill beg

Page-Object Pattern for Selenium Test Automation with Python

Page-object model is a pattern that you can apply it to develop efficient automation framework. With the page-model, it is possible to minimize maintenance cost. Basically page-object means that your every page is inherited from a base class which includes basic functionalities for every page. If you have some new functionalities that every page should have, you can simple add it to the base class. Base class is like the following: In this part we are creating pages which are inherited from base page. Every page has its own functionalities written as python functions. Some functions return to a new page, it means that these functions leave the current page and produce a new page. You should write as much as functions you need in the assertion part because this is the only part you can use the webdriver functions to interact with web pages . This part can be evaluate as providing data to assertion part.   The last part is related to asserting your test cases against to the

Create an Alias for Interactive Console Work: Selenium and Capybara

If you are working on shell most of the time Aliases are very helpfull and time saving. For testing purposes you can use Alias for getting ready your test suites. In this post, I want to explain both running Selenium and Capybara on console and creating aliases for each.  This post is for Windows machines, if you are using Unix-like see   this post . Creating Scripts for Selenium and Capybara First of all, it is assumed that you have installed Selenium and Capybara correctly and they work on your machines. If you haven't installed, you can see my previous posts. I am using the Selenium with Python and the Capybara with Ruby. You can use several different language for Selenium but Capybara works only with Ruby.  Create scripts in a directory called scripts (in your home folder, like as  ~/scripts ) for your automation tool as following, save them as capybara.rb, sel.py :  Creating Aliases Depends on your favourite shell, you need to add the alias to .bashrc bash

Performance Testing on CI: Locust is running on Jenkins

For a successful Continuous Integration pipeline, there should be jobs for testing the performance of the application. It is necessary if the application is still performing well. Generally performance testing is thought as kinds of activities performed one step before going to live. In general approach it is true but don't forget to test your application's performance as soon as there is an testable software, such as an api end point, functions, and etc. For CI it is a good approach to testing performance after functional testing and just before the deployment of next stage. In this post, I want to share some info about Jenkins and Locust. In my previous post you can find some information about Locust and Jenkins. Jenkins operates the CI environment and Locust is a tool for performance testing. To run the Locust on Jenkins you need command line arguments which control the number of clients ,   hatch rate,  running locust without web interface and there should be so